Proof that contradicts the theories of Global Warming is actively suppressed, both by an hysterical media whose profits no one can deny are dependant upon sensationalism and by transient democratic governments pandering for voters from the ranks of popular opinion. Regrettably even such contrary evidence as does surface is apparently far too complicated though for misinformed devotees of the Global Warming myth to comprehend.

Persecution, victimisation and vendettas launched as ‘Protecting the Environment’ against challengers to the Global Warming myth would be considered both an outrage and certainly illegal if perpetrated anywhere in the civilised world in the name of any other prejudice.

To be a scientist or an engineer that understands the physics requires years of training and experience combined with informed application of facts based upon proven and repeatable scientific experiment. Gaining quedos from ones peers by being seen as ‘Green’ merely requires ‘parrot learning’ then reciting of the herd mantra.

It subversively pokes fun at rich people that they don’t give a fuck about what’s going on around them and they just care about what they look like.

We can see how some major architectural landmarks are submerged and this would show sum what of a negative issue – hence why this is clearly not promoting global warming as a good thing. Its simply saying – “The world is screwed, but I still look great”

As an advertiser I can see how this campaign hit its target demographic – not super rich, but still well off, young, fashion conscious individuals – perfectly.

Yes its cruel, yes it thoughtless, and yes – it’s advertising

However, if the campaign offends people, which from reading some of the statements above i can clearly see it does, then has diesel really done it’s job properly. Delicate matters are to be handled in a delicate way and although i can see the funny side, i can imagine more than a few that can’t.

I own one Diesel jean and it’s the mot resistant I’ve ever seen. After 4 or 5 years and intensive wearing, it’s still there, not even a tiny hole in it.

No, I’m not working for Diesel, I’m not even a brand fan, but according to my experience, I would say Diesel is better than another one concerning global warming because they are manufacturing high quality products.

OK, they are not aiming at my kind of customer, buying one jean every 5 years But knowing it will last for years, if I cared about global warming and had to buy a new jean, I would go for a Diesel one because the gaz emitted during the production of this jean won’t be emitted again for the four next years!

I’m saying I don’t care about global warming but in fact I do, subconsciously. I really love sustainability, buying and repairing second hands things, and even clothes, so I’m only sticking at beauty of ads, I don’t feel concerned as a customer by advertising.

I guess most global warming concerned people saying here this ad sucks won’t buy any Diesel product, when they should, in fact

Where are the world’s poor in these photos? drowned in Buenos and dead of thirst in china.

I think the pictures are really hot but the sort of people who buy these clothes are already rich, they know about the problem and this just tells them that as long as they have got the money they will survive it AND look good. Its not challenging anytning, only people who already care about global warming will think this is shocking. The everyday people who actually buy these clothes will just reaffirm their belief that money will make global warming go away, and really – its not that serious.

Its fucked and fucking typical.